8 Revealed Preference
For more information on these topics, see Varian Chapter 7: Revealed Preference.
8.1 Objective
In previous chapters, we explored what preferences can reveal about people’s behavior. However, preferences are not directly observable in practice. This chapter explains how to infer a consumer’s preferences based on their demand information.
8.2 Assumptions
In this chapter, for simplicity we’ll assume that preferences are monotonic and strictly convex.
8.3 The Principle of Revealed Preference
If \((x_1, x_2)\) is chosen, then it is directly revealed preferred to all bundles in the shaded blue area: that is, all bundles \((y_1, y_2)\) such that \(p_1 x_1 + p_2 x_2 \geq p_1 y_1 + p_2 y_2\).
If one bundle is chosen when another is affordable, that indicates that the first bundle is not only directly revealed preferred, but also that it is preferred:
8.4 Indirectly Revealed Preferred
8.5 Trapping the Indifference Curve
8.6 Classwork 8
All our analysis depends on the assumption that consumers have preferences and consistently choose the best bundle of goods they can afford. If consumers do not behave this way, our estimates of the indifference curves become meaningless. So, how can we determine if consumers are actually following this maximizing model? The answer is WARP:
Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference: If \((x_1, x_2)\) is directly revealed preferred to \((y_1, y_2)\), and the two bundles are not the same, then it cannot happen that \((y_1, y_2)\) is directly revealed preferred to \((x_1, x_2)\).
For example, the image below demonstrates a violation of WARP:
When faced with a flatter budget line, the consumer chooses the bundle \((x_1, x_2)\) even though the bundle \((y_1, y_2)\) is also affordable. However, when the budget line becomes steeper due to a change in prices, the consumer switches their choice to \((y_1, y_2)\) even though \((x_1, x_2)\) remains affordable.
This situation suggests one of two possibilities:
The consumer is not selecting the optimal bundle they can afford.
There are other changes in the choice problem that we have not observed.
In any case, this type of violation does not align with the model of consumer choice in a stable environment.
When prices are \((p_1, p_2) = (1, 2)\) a consumer demands \((x_1, x_2) = (1, 2)\), and when prices are \((q_1, q_2) = (2, 1)\) the consumer demands \((y_1, y_2) = (2, 1)\). Is this behavior consistent with the model of maximizing behavior?
When prices are \((p_1, p_2) = (2, 1)\) a consumer demands \((x_1, x_2) = (1, 2)\), and when prices are \((q_1, q_2) = (1, 2)\) the consumer demands \((y_1, y_2) = (2, 1)\). Is this behavior consistent with the model of maximizing behavior?
In part b), which bundle is preferred by the consumer, the x-bundle or the y-bundle?